Your report should not die in a PDF.
Every inspection platform ends at delivery. We are building the part that comes after: your findings become the homeowner's living record of the house, with the systems you flagged and what they will cost to put right. Your name stays on it.
Not built yet. We are designing it with working inspectors first.
The most valuable document a homeowner ever receives, and it is never opened again.
An inspection report is the single most complete picture a house will ever have: every system, its condition, its remaining life, written by someone who spent hours looking. Then it becomes a PDF in an email, read once during a purchase and never again. The buyer moves in, forgets which panel you flagged, and three years later replaces the furnace in an emergency you predicted. We think that is the real waste in this industry, and it is not a reporting-speed problem. It is what happens after delivery.
What we are designing, with inspectors in the room.
The report stays alive
Findings are planned to land in the homeowner's record as real systems with real dates, so the roof you gave five years to is still on their books in year four. Your report becomes the spine of how they run the house.
In design: findings as a cost forecast
Remaining service life is the most actionable thing in a report. We are designing it to drive a ten-year forecast on the homeowner's side, so your judgement turns into their planning instead of a line they skim.
Your brand on the delivery
Planned for the first phase: a branded client portal rather than an attachment, so the report arrives looking like your business. Delivery is where we can be useful before anything else is built.
In design: defects routed to verified trades
The contractor directory is real and running today, with licence and insurance records against each trade. Routing a flagged defect into it is the part that is not built. The intent is that it can happen without you being asked to recommend anyone or carry that liability.
In design: a client relationship that does not end
Today an inspector meets a client once. If your report is the record they keep using, you are the professional attached to that house, which is a referral position no reporting tool can give you.
In design: a clear line on what you see
Inspectors will see the jobs they are engaged for and nothing else. Homeowner financial data, other properties, and unrelated records stay out of reach by design, not by policy.
Where this actually stands.
- 01
Phase one is delivery, not authoring
We are not asking you to change how you write reports. The first phase takes a finished report, gives it a branded portal, and carries the findings into the homeowner's record. Your current tool keeps doing what it does well.
- 02
Nothing is built yet
There is no firm account, no scheduling, no report editor and no portal today. The design exists, the homeowner side it plugs into is real and running, and that is the honest state of it.
- 03
Design partners shape it
We would rather build this with a handful of working Canadian inspectors than guess. That means showing you the design, hearing where it is wrong, and changing it before anyone writes the code.
- 04
Authoring comes only if phase one earns it
Templates, an editor, scheduling, and agreements are designed but deliberately gated. If the delivery layer does not prove useful to you, building the rest would be the wrong call and we would rather find that out early.
Fair questions.
Can I use this today?
No. Nothing of the inspector platform is built. What exists today is the homeowner side it is designed to feed: property records, appliance and system history, documents, and the cost forecast. We are recruiting design partners before writing the inspector code, not selling early access to software.
Do I have to leave my current reporting software?
No, and that is deliberate. The first phase is designed around a finished report from whatever tool you already use. Report writing is a craft with a lot of muscle memory behind it, and asking you to relearn it in order to try a delivery layer would be a bad trade.
How is this different from the inspection software I already have?
Those products compete on getting the report out faster, which matters and which they do well. None of them have a homeowner product, so their story necessarily ends at delivery. Ours starts there: the findings become the record the homeowner keeps using, and you stay attached to the house.
What does the homeowner get, and what does it cost them?
The report, a record of the systems in their home, and a forecast of what those systems will cost. Habyn's Home plan is free for the home you live in, with no card and no time limit, so nothing about your delivery depends on your client buying something.
What would you see about my clients or my business?
Inspectors are scoped to the jobs they are engaged for. The design puts inspection work in its own boundary with its own access rules, so a homeowner's finances, their other properties, and records unrelated to your job are not reachable. We would rather enforce that structurally than promise it.
What does being a design partner involve?
Conversations, not commitments. You would see the design early, tell us where it does not match how inspections actually run in Canada, and help decide what phase one has to include to be worth your time. There is no fee and no obligation to adopt anything later.
We would rather get this wrong in a conversation than in code.
If you inspect homes in Canada and the idea of your report outliving the transaction is interesting, we want to hear where this design breaks. Especially if you think it does.
Design partners
Tell us where this design is wrong.
There is nothing to install and nothing to buy. We want to show working Canadian inspectors what we are planning and hear what we have misunderstood, before any of it is built.